Find IP Sell IP AI Assistant Chip Talk Chip Videos About Us
Log In

Chip Talk > TSMC's Exit from Gallium Nitride (GaN) Foundry Business by 2027: Technical Analysis and Business Impac

TSMC's Exit from Gallium Nitride (GaN) Foundry Business by 2027: Technical Analysis and Business Impac

Published July 08, 2025

aiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the world’s leading foundry vendor, has announced its decision to phase out its gallium nitride (GaN) wafer foundry services by July 31, 2027. This strategic move has sent ripples through the semiconductor industry, particularly affecting customers like Navitas Semiconductor, Rohm, and STMicroelectronics, who relied on TSMC for GaN chip production. This blog post provides a detailed technical analysis of TSMC’s GaN operations, explores the reasons behind its exit, evaluates the business implications, and discusses the broader market and competitive landscape, drawing on recent industry developments.

Understanding Gallium Nitride (GaN) Technology

What is GaN?

Gallium Nitride (GaN) is a wide bandgap semiconductor material composed of gallium and nitrogen. Unlike traditional silicon-based semiconductors, GaN offers superior electrical properties, including:

  1. Higher Breakdown Voltage: GaN devices can operate at higher voltages, making them ideal for high-power applications.
  2. Faster Switching Speeds: GaN’s high electron mobility enables faster switching, reducing energy losses in power conversion.
  3. Higher Operating Temperatures: GaN’s thermal stability supports applications in harsh environments.
  4. Compact Form Factor: GaN devices are smaller and more efficient, enabling compact system designs.

GaN is a third-generation semiconductor, alongside silicon carbide (SiC), and is used in two primary sub-segments:

  1. Power Electronics: Applications include fast chargers, power supplies, electric vehicles (EVs), and AI data center power systems.
  2. Radio Frequency (RF): GaN is critical for 5G infrastructure, defense electronics, and satellite communications due to its high-frequency performance.

TSMC’s GaN Operations

TSMC has historically produced GaN devices using its 6-inch (150mm) and 8-inch (200mm) fabrication facilities (fabs), primarily employing GaN-on-Silicon (GaN-on-Si) technology. This approach leverages silicon substrates to reduce costs compared to more complex alternatives like GaN-on-QST (used by Vanguard International Semiconductor, VIS). TSMC’s GaN portfolio catered to customers like Navitas (100V and 650V GaN power ICs), STMicroelectronics, and Rohm, serving applications in power electronics and RF.

Reasons for TSMC’s Exit from the GaN Foundry Market

TSMC’s decision to exit the GaN foundry business is driven by a combination of market dynamics, competitive pressures, and strategic priorities. Below are five key reasons, supported by technical and business insights:

1. Declining Profitability Due to Chinese Competition

China’s aggressive investment in GaN technology, backed by government subsidies, has significantly lowered global GaN chip prices. Chinese foundries like Innoscience, Sanan IC, and CR Microelectronic’s Runxin Micro have scaled up production, particularly using cost-effective GaN-on-Si processes. This has eroded profit margins in the GaN market, making it less attractive for TSMC, which prioritizes high-margin segments like advanced logic processors for AI and high-performance computing (HPC). For instance, TSMC’s HPC segment, driven by clients like Nvidia, accounted for 59% of its revenue ($15 billion) in Q1 2025, dwarfing GaN’s contribution.

2. Small and Maturing GaN Market

While the GaN market is growing, its scale remains modest compared to TSMC’s core markets. According to Yole Group, the power GaN market is projected to grow from $260 million in 2023 to $2.01 billion by 2029, and the RF GaN market from $1.1 billion to $2 billion over the same period. In contrast, TSMC’s HPC market alone generates significantly higher revenue. The GaN market is also maturing, with increasing consolidation as larger players acquire smaller ones, and new entrants, particularly from China, intensify price competition. This maturing market dynamics reduces the long-term strategic value of GaN for TSMC.

3. Shift to Advanced Nodes and AI

TSMC is heavily investing in advanced process nodes, such as its 2nm technology, set to ramp up in the second half of 2025. These nodes require substantial capital expenditure and offer higher margins than specialty processes like GaN. The company’s focus on AI-driven HPC, where it holds a 75% foundry market share by 2026, underscores its strategic pivot toward high-growth, high-margin segments. Exiting GaN allows TSMC to reallocate resources, including repurposing its Fab 5 in Hsinchu, Taiwan, for advanced packaging technologies like CoWoS (Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate) to meet AI chip demand.

4. Overcrowded GaN Foundry Landscape

The GaN foundry market is becoming increasingly crowded, with players like Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (PSMC), VIS, Xfab, IGSS GaN, Polar Semiconductor, and GlobalFoundries competing for market share. Many of these foundries, particularly in China, offer lower-cost GaN-on-Si production, leading to a potential price war. TSMC’s 6-inch GaN production lines are less competitive as the industry transitions to 8-inch (200mm) wafers, which offer better economies of scale. Investing in 200mm GaN production would require significant capital, with limited returns given the competitive landscape.

5. Strategic Hand-Off to VIS

TSMC holds a 27.55% stake in Vanguard International Semiconductor (VIS), a Taiwanese foundry offering 200mm GaN-on-QST technology. By exiting GaN, TSMC can redirect potential GaN customers to VIS, maintaining influence in the market without direct investment. This strategic hand-off simplifies TSMC’s portfolio while leveraging VIS’s expertise in specialty processes, making the exit decision more palatable.

Technical Analysis of TSMC’s GaN Exit

GaN-on-Si vs. Competing Technologies

TSMC’s GaN-on-Si technology is cost-effective but faces competition from alternative approaches like GaN-on-QST (used by VIS) and GaN-on-Sapphire, which offer different performance trade-offs. GaN-on-Si leverages existing silicon fab infrastructure, reducing costs, but its performance in high-voltage applications (e.g., 650V) is less optimized compared to GaN-on-QST, which provides better thermal and electrical properties. The industry’s shift to 200mm wafers further disadvantages TSMC’s 6-inch GaN lines, as larger wafers improve yield and cost-efficiency.

Impact on TSMC’s Manufacturing Infrastructure

TSMC’s GaN production occurs at its Fab 5 facility in Hsinchu, Taiwan, which processes 3,000–4,000 6-inch wafers per month. Post-exit, TSMC plans to repurpose this facility for advanced packaging, a high-demand area driven by AI chip production. Advanced packaging technologies like CoWoS and wafer-level system integration (WLSI) require cleanroom facilities that align with TSMC’s existing infrastructure, enabling a seamless transition. This move optimizes fab utilization and aligns with TSMC’s focus on high-margin, high-volume markets.

Customer Transition Challenges

TSMC’s exit requires its GaN customers to transition to new foundries, which involves requalifying processes and ensuring supply chain continuity. For example:

  1. Navitas: Transitioning to PSMC for 100V and 650V GaN devices, with 100V production starting in H1 2026 and 650V devices over 12–24 months. PSMC’s GaN-on-Si process aligns with TSMC’s, minimizing technical disruptions.
  2. STMicroelectronics: Partnered with Innoscience, which operates a 200mm GaN fab in China, ensuring scalability and cost competitiveness.
  3. Rohm: Has not yet announced a new foundry partner, posing potential risks to its GaN supply chain.

The transition period, supported by TSMC’s last-time-buy (LTB) option, allows customers to secure supply until July 2027, but requalification on new foundry processes could introduce delays and costs.

Business Impact Analysis

Impact on TSMC

TSMC’s exit from GaN is unlikely to significantly affect its financial performance, as GaN constitutes a small fraction of its revenue. The company forecasts 24–26% revenue growth in 2025 (in USD terms), driven by HPC and advanced nodes, unaffected by the GaN exit. By focusing on AI, 2nm processes, and advanced packaging, TSMC strengthens its position in high-growth markets, maintaining its 75% foundry market share by 2026. Repurposing Fab 5 for advanced packaging further enhances TSMC’s competitiveness in AI chip production.

Impact on GaN Customers

  1. Navitas: The partnership with PSMC and Nvidia for 800V HVDC power systems positions Navitas to capitalize on AI data center demand. However, transitioning 650V devices over 12–24 months may involve requalification costs and risks.
  2. STMicroelectronics: The shift to Innoscience mitigates supply risks and leverages China’s cost advantages, but geopolitical tensions could complicate long-term reliability.
  3. Rohm: Without a new foundry partner, Rohm faces supply chain uncertainty, potentially losing market share in GaN power electronics.

Impact on the GaN Market

TSMC’s exit creates a supply gap that competitors like PSMC, Innoscience, and VIS are poised to fill. The global GaN market is projected to grow significantly:

  1. Power GaN: From $260 million in 2023 to $2.01 billion by 2029 (Yole Group).
  2. RF GaN: From $1.1 billion in 2023 to $2 billion by 2029.
  3. Total GaN Market: From $2.34 billion in 2024 to $7.64 billion by 2031 (CAGR of 18.7%, QYResearch).

Infineon’s entry into 300mm GaN wafer production by Q4 2025 positions it to dominate the market, leveraging economies of scale and existing infrastructure. The GaN market’s growth, driven by AI, EVs, and 5G, suggests that TSMC’s exit may benefit competitors with specialized GaN expertise.

Competitive Landscape

  1. Chinese Foundries: Innoscience, Sanan IC, and CR Microelectronic benefit from government subsidies and low-cost production, intensifying price competition.
  2. PSMC: Gains a strategic advantage by securing Navitas’s orders and aligning with AI power demands.
  3. Infineon: Its 300mm GaN fab positions it as a leader in high-efficiency power applications.
  4. VIS: As a TSMC affiliate, VIS could absorb redirected GaN business, though its GaN-on-QST process is more expensive.

Outcome and Future Outlook

Short-Term Outcome (2025–2027)

TSMC’s phased exit, supported by LTB options, ensures a smooth transition for customers, minimizing supply disruptions. Navitas and STMicroelectronics have secured alternative foundries, while Rohm’s delay in announcing a partner could lead to competitive disadvantages. The GaN market will see increased competition, particularly from Chinese foundries, potentially driving further price reductions.

Long-Term Outlook (Post-2027)

TSMC’s exit may accelerate consolidation in the GaN foundry market, with larger players like Infineon and PSMC capturing market share. The repurposing of Fab 5 for advanced packaging aligns with TSMC’s focus on AI, potentially increasing its dominance in HPC. The GaN market’s growth trajectory remains strong, driven by demand for energy-efficient solutions in AI data centers, EVs, and 5G infrastructure. However, price pressures and geopolitical risks, particularly involving Chinese suppliers, could challenge market stability.

Broader Industry Implications

TSMC’s strategic retreat highlights a broader industry trend: leading foundries prioritizing high-margin, high-volume markets like AI and advanced nodes over specialty processes. This shift could prompt other foundries to reassess their GaN strategies, potentially leading to a shakeout among smaller players. Meanwhile, Singapore’s new National Semiconductor Translation and Innovation Centre for GaN (NSTIC) and Infineon’s 300mm fab underscore global efforts to advance GaN technology, filling the gap left by TSMC.

Conclusion

TSMC’s decision to exit the GaN foundry business by July 2027 reflects a calculated move to prioritize high-margin, high-growth markets like AI and advanced nodes. Driven by Chinese competition, a maturing GaN market, and strategic resource allocation, the exit poses challenges for customers like Rohm but opens opportunities for competitors like PSMC and Infineon. The GaN market’s growth trajectory remains robust, but price pressures and supply chain transitions will shape its future. TSMC’s focus on advanced packaging and HPC ensures its financial resilience, reinforcing its position as the world’s leading foundry.

Sources

  1. Commercial Times, Liberty Times, Focus Taiwan, Central News Agency
  2. Digitimes, Taipei Times, TrendForce News
  3. TechPowerUp, Yole Group
  4. Navitas Semiconductor SEC Filing, SemiMedia
  5. Electronics Manufacturing News, Power Electronics News
  6. QYResearch, Global Insight Services
  7. Evertiq, Technology Org
  8. X Posts by @semivision_tw, @rwang07, @loongkingdom


Get In Touch

Sign up to Silicon Hub to buy and sell semiconductor IP

Sign Up for Silicon Hub

Join the world's most advanced semiconductor IP marketplace!

It's free, and you'll get all the tools you need to discover IP, meet vendors and manage your IP workflow!

No credit card or payment details required.

Sign up to Silicon Hub to buy and sell semiconductor IP

Welcome to Silicon Hub

Join the world's most advanced AI-powered semiconductor IP marketplace!

It's free, and you'll get all the tools you need to advertise and discover semiconductor IP, keep up-to-date with the latest semiconductor news and more!

Plus we'll send you our free weekly report on the semiconductor industry and the latest IP launches!

Switch to a Silicon Hub buyer account to buy semiconductor IP

Switch to a Buyer Account

To evaluate IP you need to be logged into a buyer profile. Select a profile below, or create a new buyer profile for your company.

Add new company

Switch to a Silicon Hub buyer account to buy semiconductor IP

Create a Buyer Account

To evaluate IP you need to be logged into a buyer profile. It's free to create a buyer profile for your company.

Chatting with Volt